2024 Scholarly Impact Report: Future Citation Classics

That is to say, amongst all of the stuff being published today in our way-too-many journals, what will prove to be the cutting-edge raw material for future behavior analysis? The most straightforward way to answer this question, of course, is to wait until the future, and see what articles from the present day got cited a lot [see Postscript 2].

But that strategy requires lots of patience, because citations build up slowly. The citation half-life of a behavior analysis article — how long it takes for half of the article’s eventual citations to accumulate — can stretch to 15 years or more).

For those not adept at waiting for a second marshmallow, here’s a short-term hack: examining attention to contemporary articles in the Mendeley reference-management tool. Mendeley “readers” are people who access the reference information of a given article that, presumably, they are considering citing. Mendeley readership correlates positively (r = +.30 to +.50) with later citation counts so, since it accumulates faster than citations, it may be assumed to foreshadow eventual citation impact.

The table below lists articles published in the past year that, so far, have the highest Mendeley readership. These articles may not have been much cited yet, but they could have special potential for future citation impact [though see Postscript 1].

A few quick procedural notes:

  • I collected data using the Altmetric Explorer app.
  • My data collection window (11/11/23 to 11/10/24) doesn’t exactly map onto the 2024 calendar year. Reason: My license to use the Altmetric Explorer app was about to expire, so I had did what I could when I could.
  • This approach gives an advantage to articles published earlier in the year and potentially underestimates the early impact of those published near year’s end. A better way to do the analysis is to determine each article’s Mendeley readership for one calendar year after its date of publication. But with my access to the Explorer app expiring, I did what I could when I could.

Without further ado, here are the past year’s Top 40 “future citation classics.” The key trends are readily apparent via the interocular percussion test, so I’ll leave you to glean those for yourself.

BAP = Behavior Analysis in Practice, BSI = Behavior & Social Issues, BI = Behavioral Interventions, BMOD = Behavior Modification, JABA = J. Applied Behavior Analysis, JCBS = J. Contextual Behavioral Science, JEAB = J. Experimental Analysis of Behavior, TPR = The Psychological Record

Correlation isn’t causation, and robust Mendeley readership doesn’t guarantee a lot of future citations. For instance, an article that attracts a lot of scholarly interest today could:

  • represent a transitory fad that is soon forgotten
  • prove not to fuel valuable discoveries in the way contemporary observers expect
  • resolve a scientific problem, leaving nothing further of substance to be investigated

Also note that the positive correlation between Mendeley readership and later citations, on which this post is predicated, has been demonstrated for articles of other disciplines. There are no published studies documenting this effect for behavior analysis articles specifically.

All that being said, Mendeley readership is a type of scholarly attention, and therefore worthy of our attention as we gauge what, in the behavior analysis literature, is making a splash.

If you want a rough idea of what (relatively) recent papers have been getting cited (rather than what recent citers have focused on), you have to embrace a longer time frame. Here’s some citation data for articles published in the past 10 years in several behavior analysis journals.

Notes:

  • Data are from a Web of Science (WOS) search conducted 11/14/24. Like all citations databases, this one is imperfect: Not all years for all journals show up in it, and other databases count citations in slightly different ways.
  • “Mean cites” = average citations per journal article during the 10-year window. This number doesn’t take into account different publication dates for different articles, and is not equivalent to a journal’s citation impact factor.
  • The two rightmost columns shows the percentage number of articles from each journal that were cited at least 10 times, and at least 40 times. Because journals release articles at different rates, and because WOS doesn’t index every publication year for every journal, the results are expressed as a percentage of relevant articles in the WOS database.
  • The following journals were excluded because WOS does not index them: Behavior & Philosophy, Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, Mexican J. Behavior Analysis, Japanese J. Behavior Analysis, European J. Behavior Analysis, J. Behaviorology.
Journal abbreviations are the same as in the Mendeley reader table, plus JOBE = J. Behavioral Education, ETC = Education and Treatment of Children, JOBM = J. Organizational Behavior Management, TAVB = The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.